# Magic UI vs Mantine, licence, downloads and MCP support

Measured comparison of Magic UI and Mantine: GitHub stars, weekly npm downloads, licence, price, MCP support and how many components of each are present in the EneUI catalog. Numbers measured 2026-10-31.

> Page: https://ui.eneawork.it/alternatives/magic-ui-vs-mantine
> Markdown: https://ui.eneawork.it/alternatives/magic-ui-vs-mantine.md

Both are real options for the same job. Magic UI has 22,984 GitHub stars, Free + Pro; Mantine has 31,893 GitHub stars, 3,697,688 weekly npm downloads, Free. The table below carries the numbers, not the opinions.

| Option | Components | Libraries | Licenza |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Magic UI | 247 | 2 | MIT |
| Mantine | 119 | 1 | MIT |

## When to pick it

- **Magic UI**, Choose Magic UI if you want its own MCP server and its house style.
- **Mantine**, Choose Mantine if the project is already on it and you do not need an index across libraries.

## Verdict

Magic UI: 22,984 GitHub stars, Free + Pro. Mantine: 31,893 GitHub stars, 3,697,688 weekly npm downloads, Free. Mantine carries the larger GitHub footprint. Magic UI ships an MCP server; Mantine does not.

## FAQ

### How many components does this page cover?

366 components measured in the catalog, across 2 families.

### How were the counts measured?

By reading the catalog: every component carries its source library and the license declared upstream. The numbers are computed per request, not copied from a post.

### Can I install them with shadcn?

Yes, every component page shows the `npx shadcn add` command against our registry, with a free token.